Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Chapter 7

"Christ is Truly God

I.   The heir of a mighty monarch once traveling incognito and unattended, visited a lonely mountain valley which belonged to his father's dominions. In order that he might be suitably received, he told the inhabitants his name and his exalted rank. Since, however, no persons throughout the valley had ever seen the crown prince, or even a likeness of him, they refused to believe in his identity without further proof, but required him to show that he was the true and lawful crown prince. And the good people were certainly not to be blamed for requiring such a proof; since otherwise any one who took it into his head to do so, might claim to be the crown prince.
II.   Nineteen hundred years ago, far away in Palestine, a Man made His appearance; He claimed to be, not merely the heir of this or that mighty monarch, but the Son of the King of heaven and earth. Yes, when this Man stood arraigned as a criminal before the high priest, said to Him: "I adjure Thee the Christ, the Son of God," this Man replied, earnestly and solemnly, "Thou hast said it, I am He!"
   Thus publicly, earnestly, and solemnly, did Jesus Christ declare Himself to be the Son of God; thus did He announce Himself as true God. And He formerly required of His hearers, as He now in like manner requires of us, that His doctrines should be accepted, and His claims received. We, therefore, on our part, have a perfect right to demand that He should prove to us that we must believe in Him, that He should show His credentials, and prove Himself to be the Son of God, prove Himself to be true God. And indeed, there is not any lack of such proofs, of such credentials. Let us examine this matter somewhat more closely.
III.   He who asserts that He is the Son of God, that He is truly God, must in the first place lead a life absolutely free from sin. When Christ stood before His mortal foes and asked, "Which of you shall convince me of sin?" they were silent. Thus we see that Christ fulfilled the primary condition, that He should be without sin. In order to furnish a proof of His divinity it was necessary that He should do works which only God could accomplish. He must be Lord of the winds and waves, of the devil, of the powers of nature, of the living and the dead. Did Christ perform such essentially divine works, which could not possible be the result, either of natural causes or of the agency of the devil?
IV.   Unbelievers have objected that in order to judge whether we have before us a work which is a miracle, and essentially divine, we need to be thoroughly acquainted with the powers of nature, and also of the devil. To this we make reply that it is only necessary to know what the forces of nature are not able to accomplish. For example, if you, dear reader, are in a room, it is plain that you can not leave that room if every opening to it is closed. Equally true it is, that ordinary mud, if rubbed upon the eye, will not cure blindness; that the devil influences no soul for good, and so on. Therefore whatever exceeds the power, either of nature or of the devil, is an essentially divine action.
   If, without involving the aid of God, without first praying for help, Christ performed such actions, He performed them in virtue of His own divine omnipotence. Christ wrought miracles by His own power; the apostles and the saints performed wonders in the name of Jesus and through prayer. If Christ really did this, by so doing He showed Himself to be truly God.
V.   That Christ performed a great number of miracles, the evangelists, the Fathers of the Church, and heathen writers alike testify. I will only mention the occasions on which He raised the dead. At Naim He recalled a dead youth to life by merely uttering this word of command: "Young man, I say to thee; Arise."
   Christ knew that Lazarus was dead, without any announcement of the fact having reach Him, and He imparted the news to the apostles, and restored Lazarus to life, although he had been four days in the grave. Numerous persons witnessed this marvelous miracle, which caused the enemies of Our Lord to determine upon His death, because they consequences. But the Pharisees entertained no doubt as to the reality of His miracles.
VI.   Thus we see that the Saviour was a divine person. He Himself on several occasions asserted it openly, and this assertion was confirmed when He was baptized in the Jordan, by a voice from heaven which declared: "This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased."
   The adversaries of Christ affirms miracles to be impossible; therefore, say they, there were no miracle at all. Hence I might simply say to any one who had fallen from a ladder: "It is not possible to fall, therefore you have not fallen!" Thus it is utterly foolish to deny the possibility of any fact, the existence of which is self-evident. Therefore even Rousseau, who did not believe in Christ, declared that he who denies the possibility of miracles ought to be placed in a lunatic asylum.
VII.   Thus do we perceive that our faith rests upon the most solid basis; Christ is truly God, He has indisputably attested Himself to be such by means of His sinless life and His glorious miracles. Wherefore gaze upon your Saviour with the eye of faith, and say:

My Lord and God I Thee confess to be,
Though foes deride, and will know naught of Thee.
Thy wondrous works reveal to human sight
Thy love divine, Thy Glory, and Thy might."

2 comments:

  1. Hello again.
    I see that you have updated your blog design since I last checked. I like it.
    This post was also a good one. I agree with the author's main assertion that JESUS the CHRIST was GOD in the flesh. That is a very important truth that the world has tried to deny since His coming. In fact the Pharisees tried to deny that JESUS even rose from the dead. This is recorded in Matthew 28:11-15
    "11 Now while they were going, behold, some of the guard came into the city and reported to the chief priests all the things that had happened. 12 When they had assembled with the elders and consulted together, they gave a large sum of money to the soldiers, 13 saying, “Tell them, ‘His disciples came at night and stole Him away while we slept.’ 14 And if this comes to the governor’s ears, we will appease him and make you secure.” 15 So they took the money and did as they were instructed; and this saying is commonly reported among the Jews until this day."
    The last paragraph of section IV made me pause to think. I understand that the author was comparing the works of the apostles(dependant on GOD) to the works of JESUS(Who Is GOD). However the part about, "without first praying for help" was what caused me to pause. For I know that JESUS prayed always to GOD the FATHER.
    Mathew 14:23 "And when He had sent the multitudes away, He went up on the mountain by Himself to pray. Now when evening came, He was alone there."
    He was that example to us that even though He was GOD in the flesh, He still relied on the Heavenly father for direction. He still yielded to His FATHER.
    Luke 22:41-44, "41 And He was withdrawn from them about a stone’s throw, and He knelt down and prayed, 42 saying, “Father, if it is Your will, take this cup away from Me; nevertheless not My will, but Yours, be done.” 43 Then an angel appeared to Him from heaven, strengthening Him. 44 And being in agony, He prayed more earnestly. Then His sweat became like great drops of blood falling down to the ground."
    JESUS made a great sacrifice for us all. Thank-you again for allowing me to post a comment. What do you think about what I said? As your blog is titled, "Reason for Blogging," I finally have, "A Reason for Commenting."
    Glory be to GOD,
    Isaiah T.S.

    ReplyDelete
  2. In Reply,
    Thanks for the comments buddy.
    I think i understand why you paused in accepting what was written, but i don't think what the author said argues with what you are saying. As you have well done sighting the scriptures that have shown that Jesus did talk to God, and did constantly pray. I think the author was just using this one incident to show as an example that He was able to accomplish these miracles with His own omnipotence, not separated from God, but as God. And of course Our Lord did set many other acts as an example for us to follow.
    Maybe one of the things that made you pause was the role between God the Father, and Jesus Christ His Son? This is a tough topic to address and one that has been argued all the way back to the 300's AD. This is the topic of the Holy Trinity. There is a great read on the history and the people involved when much of this area of our faith was threatened. You can find it @
    http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01707c.htm

    Thanks again and I hope i was able to answer your questions, and I look forward to hearing more of your comments.
    In Christ the King
    Jimmy

    ReplyDelete